Numerical analysis of HT dpm between hero and paladin

Yes I mean, you can decide the time point of 2nd head casting cancel.
But the data from my post shows that time point do 0 influence to cancel situation.

Another thing is, 2nd head has independent chance for 50%mc or 50%wc.
This is the thing that you cannot control.
As a result, whether you control time point or not, it goes to same results in average.

 

Let me reply seperately to accurate the concept i'm saying.

1. Everyone cannot control cancel into favorable conditions.
2. Because 2nd head's cancel is random, wc or mc.

1. Before we talk about Favorable condition for cleave and for range, we should look at cancel situation (aka 2heads' cancel mechanism).
2. Favorable condition for cleave = double wc + double mc = 1/2
3. Favorable condition for range = 1wc + 1mc = 1/2

1. Whichever "time point" is choosen, the results should contain a combination of "lucky(50%) + unlucky(50%)"
2. 2nd head's cancel cannot be controlled as it is random.

 

Most of the words above are correct.
For futher explanation of "which may not be the best representation of the real situation".
We should keep in mind that:
"there is 50% chance to you to get the best condition, but there is also 50% chance to you to get the worst condition."
(In other words, It is all about 2 heads' Cancel mechanism.)
Another reason is, you cannot control 2nd head cancel.

1) having different starting point
If you are talking about different starting point, here is the pic.
Please look at 2 yellow circles.
it shows that whatever you choose the time point for 2nd head's cancel, they have same results.
Keep in mind: "you have 1/2 chance to get better cancel condition for range, but you have also 1/2 chance to get worse cancel condition for range."

2) increases head available skills to cast (by focusing head until below certain threshold so that it has more summons skill or dispel skill)
This is totally discussing different directions.
When you adjust the total time of wc+mc, it leads to the results in Part4.
→ As the total time of wc+mc increases (0%~100%), a single-target attacker get (0~50%) benefits.

I will not further explan the following 2 concepts:
(1) how does total time of wc+mc affect 2 heads' Cancel mechansim
(2) how does the 3 heads' Cancel mechanism affect range and cleave
Until people 100% understand what is the 2 head's Cancel mechanism.

Edit:
I mean : before we expand the assumption/results to 3 heads, we should know the 2 heads' Cancel mechanism first.

 

Update:
1. Delete original summary in Part4.
2. Add a more appropriate summary in Part4.
3. re-write (8-4).

 

More explanation about Best or Worst case for pure range HT squad.
---
For range attacker, range favor the cancel situation with "1mc 1wc (rotate)",
which look like this:

---
But, because you cannot control 2nd head's cancel, it might has 50% chance fail to the double wc like this:

---
When we are talking about expected value, we have to consider the chance for each case.
So we have to multiply each case by 1/2 chance.
It will look like this:

When the total time of mc+wc = 100%, this result can be applied to other "different time point" cases.

warning
This is when we discuss in total time of wc+mc = 100%.