Teamviewer farming. Considered botting?

Camille Guess we’re allowed to account share now if this thread turns out favorably.

 

No 1 is risky.
2, 3, 4 totally violated account sharing rules

 

2,3, and 4 are clearly account sharing but I would argue that 1 is botting due to the AFK nature of it. However, you're still allowed to play legends through Teamviewer as long as you don't AFK Bahamut bot, right?

 

better question is if you activate it naturally without any 3rd party programm.
is it allowed to just let it do what it wants and wait until it expire to recast it?

 

the trick is to not get caught, if you are not caught then you are not doing anything wrong

 

I think this is fine since you arent actually attacking or anything, its literally pressing a buff once then leaving. Nor are you using a 3rd party program or paperweight.

 

So if I train my dog to press a button for buffs every min or two, then that's not considered botting right?
Wait, then now its considered as account sharing.

Kappa

 

No, people have been banned for botting for doing this to farm heartstoppers. That's why I'm saying doing it through teamviewer is a botting offense.

 

from my knowledge from other private server, their staff expect u to reply if someone asked any question to you when u come back to rebuff, so if u fail to reply longer than your buff duration time, you can be banned for botting.

Not sure how it works in MapleLegends though

 

last time I asked this, it was considered botting
(if I pressed frostprey and went afk at voodoos)

 

Would be really stupid to consider it as botting, it's literally a function of the skill itself...

 

Please make a video when your dog is doing that. I want to see.

 

I'm of the same opinion, but this was the reply I got from staff the last time I asked

 

inb4 I get banned for providing definite proof of account sharing
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

 

RIP.

 

people still do it at gs2 summon bahamut and go away.. can i ban them next time

 

It'd be good if we could have further clarifications on this matter.
I can only consider it as botting under the scenario where someone does the above but does not respond to questions at all over a period of time and continues to repeat the same action.