1. Hello!

    First of all, welcome to MapleLegends! You are currently viewing the forums as a guest, so you can only view the first post of every topic. We highly recommend registering so you can be part of our community.

    By registering to our forums you can introduce yourself and make your first friends, talk in the shoutbox, contribute, and much more!

    This process only takes a few minutes and you can always decide to lurk even after!

    - MapleLegends Administration-
  2. Experiencing disconnecting after inserting your login info? Make sure you are on the latest MapleLegends version. The current latest version is found by clicking here.
    Dismiss Notice

Shaolin 5-6F EPH data and suggestions for new changes

Discussion in 'Suggestions' started by sandpickle, Dec 22, 2020.

Thread Status:
You must be a logged-in, registered member of this site to view further posts in this thread.
  1. sandpickle
    Offline

    sandpickle Mushmom

    59
    18
    65
    Dec 1, 2020
    Male
    6:19 PM
    firepickle
    Magician
    72
    Cucumber
    I've made a couple posts on the official balance changes thread, but I'll post EPH data, the 5-6 rotation, and possible suggestions for changes here. Feel free to skim through all the parts as this will be pretty long.


    A quick introduction and some background.
    My main is a level 180 bishop, and about 90% of my playtime in ML has been selling leech. The other 5% of the time I spend booming my mesos, and the last 5% chatting with friends. What's always been important to me when selling leech is optimal and consistent EPH - no one likes a seller whose EPH is lower than advertised + constantly fluctuates.

    Prior to the Shaolin mob changes + removal of macro for mage ultimate skills, my level 162 Hero was getting around 73m eph solo.

    Below is the solo EPH data I gathered.
    - 58m, 57.8m, 54.7m, 58m
    - 52.8m, 52.6m, 49.7m, 52.8m (adjusted EPH for non-event).
    The new EPH data averages to around ~51.9m eph, or roughly a 30% eph decrease.

    Below is the trio EPH data I gathered.
    Level 132: 33m, 38m, 42m, 34.5m = 36.875m or 33.3m
    Level 155: 40m, 46m, 48.5m, 41.1m = 43.9m or 39.9m
    Level 162: 42m, 47m, 47.8m, 42.5m = 44.825m or 40.8m eph.

    From 150-160, my hero would receive, on average, 53-54m exp per hour. The trio eph data also shows a ~30% eph decrease.

    Below is the trio EPH data of my mages with 1200 TMA.
    Level 132: 24.4m
    Level 155: 29m
    Level 162: 30m
    It seems pretty worthless to try and sell 5-6 leech now if you can't 3 hit gold monks.

    On average, the eph has decreased by around 30%.

    An FP requires, at minimum, 1150 TMA to 3 hit silver monks, and an IL requires around 1180 TMA. These values are important because it allows both mages to stand on the top platform, having their summons kill the gold monks in around the same time the silver monks would die. This TMA threshold leads to around 35m-44m eph. Because the gold monks do not die consistently during one rotation of spells (3 casts of blizzard/meteor), the spawn of gold and silver monks begin to stagger, causing massive eph flucuations.

    An FP requires 1330 TMA to 3 hit gold monks, and an IL requires 1360 TMA to 3 hit gold monks. Once this threshold is achieved, a mage with perfect rotations can expect around 43m-56m+ eph. I hit this damage requirement at 174 on my IL, and 171 on my FP with high-tier mage gear.

    Selling 5-6 leech can seem to be effortless and brainless. and when the seller is spam casting their abilities, it is. However, this leads to inconsistent and low EPH. Sellers either take the EPH decrease or attempt one of the two different methods: running a taunt mule, or syncing the two mage macro casts, and consistently repositioning the mages.

    Once the FP/IL mages hit the TMA threshold to 3 hit gold monks, the rotation seemed pretty simple: put the FP on the bottom platform by the staircase, and IL at the top right of the map. Cast the ultimates at the same time with a macro, and continually reposition the mages to maximize the mobs hit. Rebuff after two casts, and wait a second before casting the macro again to keep the spawn consistent.
    This rotation achieves two things: a consistent EPH, and a high EPH. Though this "rotation" much fewer actions/minute than running a taunt mule OR selling skeles/petris with a sweeper, it requires more attention, as one miss-timed cast or one missed cast will cause the spawn to stagger, leading to the EPH falling.
    The synced-cast rotation helped achieve a high EPH, and it was by no means "effortless" - even though you weren't consistently using your keyboard, you had to watch the positioning of the mages and, after every cast or two, reposition the FP mages, and usually reposition the IL mage after 1 or 2 rotations. Because it's vital to cast the ultimate at the same time, and continually reposition, you have to always stay focused on the screen.


    Instead of timing the casts of the ultimates, you now have to spam cast the ability whenever you get the chance. Because there is no more macros, you have to either click between the two clients or alt+tab every second or two. This requires a lot more APM but surprisingly a little less focus. Now that you can't sync the two mages, you can just go back to spam casting. This will lead to the respawn of the monks to go crazy, leading to inconsistent EPH as shown from the trio EPH data above.

    I've sold about a few hours of 5-6 leech post-nerf. As stated above, it requires much less attention but a lot more movement/"interaction with the character". While it does require a decent amount of more effort, it doesn't require nearly the same amount of focus that the other rotation offered (pre-nerf).
    This is because, prior to the changes, only the FP mage would consistently need to be repositioned. However, now that both mages get knocked around, you just flip a coin and reposition that mage first.

    The macro is important to multi client leeching because it allows for the mages to attack in sync. Even if the freeze changes and mob jumping changes were reverted, it would be near impossible to continue the "Synced-cast rotation" as you are changing clients every couple seconds. One thing I noticed from the new changes is that, sometimes, the ultimate does not cast (most likely due to the skill being pressed early). A missed cast/miss-timed cast ruins the respawn of the monks, thus lowering eph.

    Potential changes/fixes.
    It's a little difficult to suggest different fixes/changes without knowing the reason for the nerf.

    Potential reason 1: 5-6 EPH was too high for end game leech.
    A potential fix for this is: reduce the spawn of monks on the map. This would allow sellers to keep their current rotation, effortless or not, while not destroying their hands by constantly changing clients.

    Potential reason 2: The potential to sell 2 channels of 5-6 leech.
    This one is much more difficult to fix without screwing over other sellers/people who train at Shaolin. The reason selling 2 channels of 5-6 works so effectively is for two reasons: the ability to spam cast macros which gives buyers around 35m+ eph, and buyers rushing to a leech with a low asking price.

    In my experience, buyers prioritize pricing more than eph. I've had buyers run when my price was 10m for 50m+ eph, yet when I sold leech at 9.5m for 36m+ eph, no one ever complained about the pricing.
    For example, a level 145 used to gain about 50m exp/hr once I achieved the tma threshold to 3 hit gold monks, but prior to this, a level 145 would receive about 42m exp. The Meso/EXP ratio for the former is 5/1 whereas the latter is a ratio of 4.42.

    The only potential fix that comes to mind is, keep the change where monster cannot be frozen in Shaolin. With how frequently the mages have to be repositioned, it would be impossible to sell 2 channels of leech, even with macros available. However, with this change, a sync'd rotation would become very difficult/near impossible as the IL mage is currently needed to reposition after every cast.

    ** An important thing to note about 2 channels of 5-6 is that it's really difficult to replicate - when Shivering first quit, I was planning on selling 2 channels, but it requires way too much focus & attention as well as another computer to run HS mules.

    Potential reason 3: 5-6 leeching, as is, is too effortless.
    While this is true in cases where mages spam cast their ultimates, the buyer and seller ultimately pay the price - lower eph for buyers, less income for the sellers. Yet Ulu2 is even more effortless than 5-6 leech, and yields 17m/hr, compared to the 20-25m/hr these sellers are making. If this is the reason 5-6 is being nerfed, please nerf ulu2 as well.

    Potential reason 4: ML doesn't want people to multi-client leech.
    I have no solution/potential fix for this.

    You might be wondering why someone just spent the past hour typing this up. Can't you just go to ob4? Can't you just sell petri or skele leech? This nerf doesn't change the identity of I/L mages at all, and you're just whining and overreacting XD

    Well, I made my two mages for the sole purpose of selling leech. In the past month, I power leveled both mages to 177/179 in order to 3 hit gold monks and get optimal EPH. Of course I'm bummed out that, without warning, IL's and FP's can't freeze mobs, and that macro-casting isn't possible. It feels like the couple hundred hours spent making these mages have gone to waste without any explanation, especially when the balance team didn't reach out to people who use live at 5-6 and ask for their opinions. Of course I'm a bit salty.

    A lot of people created IL mages > FP mages because of the ability for Blizzard to freeze mobs. A lot of people have memed and said "just go ob4" - that doesn't solve the issue at all of an IL's identity - and I/L's identity is so much more than "doing bonus Ice/Lightning damage". Would you ever consider a Bishop's identity to be "doing holy damage to skeles"?

    So @balanceteam, please take the time to read through at least the potential reasonings for nerfing 5-6, and maybe there can be a discussion amongst 5-6 sellers & balance staff to look into different ways of changing Shaolin.
     
    • Agree x 10
    • Great Work x 4
    • Informative x 4
    • Like x 1
    • Disagree x 1
Thread Status:
You must be a logged-in, registered member of this site to view further posts in this thread.

Share This Page