Terms & Conditions: Detailed Explanations, Precedents, Interpretations

Agreed, it was just an example and it wasn't targeted at anyone. It was targeted to anyone that advertised MU with their leech service that also has taunt. But if anyone doesn't know Taunt works even if the Taunter isn't in the party. I didn't mean or intend on this to be targeted at anyone, I only just used a number that I saw on the first smega that had the words Skele, MU and Taunt. and I've left my client open for a few days so the history was just there so I just grabbed what I saw and used it as an example. If anyone thought I aimed it towards anyone I didn't mean to and I apologize for that, and I'll say it again. I genuinely did not mean to target anyone, it wasn't my intent.

 

In light of recent events, I think this deserves a bump. I'd also like to see some clarifications on pink bean and potential aggro abuse there, since it's the new kid on the block and I'd rather if we get all the rulings out of the way before something happens to some group.

 

Is the invisible weapon glitch still acceptable to do? (Obtained by wearing nx weapons that don't have frames for the weapon you're using because it isn't supported.)



Crossbow options are kinda ugly.